Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check
Message number: 461
Message text: Registered association &1 is not unique; used in data source &2 and &3
You registered association <(>&<)>1, which is not defined locally in
registered CDS View <(>&<)>4 but comes from at least two different data
sources <(>&<)>2 and <(>&<)>3.
All Data Source Extensions for <(>&<)>4 based on this association, would
lead to Syntax Errors in the CDS View Extensions as the association
<(>&<)>1 is not unique for the DDIC activation.
You cannot register this association<(>,<)> because new Data Source
Extensions would lead to DDIC activation errors and existing Data Source
Extensions would lead to Syntax Errors during Upgrade on customer side!
You have the following options:
Rename the association <(>&<)>1 in one of the underlying Data Sources
(e.g. in the joined CDS View). Then the association from the other Data
Source is used which would be then unique again.
Define the association <(>&<)>1 also locally in the registered CDS View
<(>&<)>4 itself and expose it. Then DDIC automatically uses the locally
defined association in the CDS View Extension.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK461
- Registered association &1 is not unique; used in data source &2 and &3 ?The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK461 indicates that there is a conflict with registered associations in the system. Specifically, it means that the association identified by
&1
is not unique because it is being used in two different data sources,&2
and&3
. This can lead to ambiguity in data retrieval and processing.Cause:
- Duplicate Associations: The same association is defined in multiple data sources, which can create confusion for the system when trying to resolve which association to use.
- Modeling Errors: There may be an error in the data model where associations are not properly defined or are overlapping.
- Configuration Issues: Incorrect configuration in the data source definitions can lead to this error.
Solution:
- Review Associations: Check the associations defined in the data sources mentioned in the error message. Ensure that each association is unique and correctly defined.
- Modify Data Sources: If the same association is indeed needed in both data sources, consider renaming one of the associations or modifying the data model to avoid the conflict.
- Check for Redundant Definitions: Look for any redundant or unnecessary definitions in your data model that could be causing the overlap.
- Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or guidelines for best practices in defining associations to avoid such conflicts.
- Testing: After making changes, test the data sources to ensure that the error is resolved and that the associations work as intended.
Related Information:
By addressing the uniqueness of the associations and ensuring proper configuration, you should be able to resolve the CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK461 error.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK460
Generic persistence view &1 must have only parameter P_KeyDate
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK459
View &1 Field &2 must have type &3.
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK462
Not draft enabled CDS view &1 is associated from draft view &2.
What causes this issue? You have registered a characteristic relevant view <(>&<)>1 that is not draft enabled. This view is reference...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK463
Chosen Source of Custom Field Data not allowed for Projection Views
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.