How To Fix CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK366 - Reuse of data Type &1 not consistent

CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK366 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check

• Message number: 366

• Message text: Reuse of data Type &1 not consistent

What causes this issue?

Reuse of proxy data types in SOAP messages is only allowed under certain
circumstances. Data type <(>&<)>1 is also used in operation <(>&<)>3 of
service interface <(>&<)>2. The registration of data type <(>&<)>1 in
operation <(>&<)>3 of service interface <(>&<)>2 is however missing.

System Response

Registration of proxy data type <(>&<)>1 for extensibility is not
consistent and will lead to an ATC error.

How to fix this error?

You must register the usage of data type <(>&<)>1 in operation <(>&<)>3
of service interface <(>&<)>2.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK366 - Reuse of data Type &1 not consistent ?

  The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK366, which states "Reuse of data type &1 not consistent," typically occurs in the context of data modeling or when working with the SAP Custom Development Framework (CDF). This error indicates that there is an inconsistency in the reuse of a data type within the system.
  
  Cause:
  
  Inconsistent Data Type Definition: The data type referenced by &1 may have been modified or defined inconsistently in different contexts or applications.
  Multiple Definitions: The same data type might be defined in multiple places, leading to conflicts in how it is used.
  Transport Issues: If the data type was transported from one system to another (e.g., from development to production), there may have been issues during the transport process that caused inconsistencies.
  Versioning Issues: Different versions of the same data type may exist in different environments, leading to compatibility issues.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Data Type Definition: Review the definition of the data type &1 in the Data