Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK - Custom Fields: Messages for Registry Check
Message number: 209
Message text: Former draft 1.0 extension association &1 not identical to active one &2
The former draft 1.0 association with alias <(>&<)>1 must select like
the active association <(>&<)>2 from extension include view <(>&<)>3
with identical on-condition. This is necessary to ensure that during
upgrade the import of a "draft 2.0 application" into a system with
already extended formerly draft 1.0 views does not stop due to syntax
errors.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Change your CDS view back to the original state where you keep the draft
association <(>&<)>1 identical to the active one <(>&<)>2.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK209
- Former draft 1.0 extension association &1 not identical to active one &2 ?The SAP error message CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK209 indicates a mismatch between a former draft extension and the currently active extension in the system. This typically occurs in the context of SAP Cloud Application Programming (CAP) or when dealing with extensions in the SAP Cloud Platform.
Cause:
The error arises when there is an inconsistency between the metadata of an extension that was previously drafted and the one that is currently active. This can happen due to several reasons:
To resolve this error, you can follow these steps:
Check the Extensions: Review the metadata of both the draft extension and the active extension. Ensure that they are identical in terms of structure, fields, and configurations.
Recreate the Draft: If there are discrepancies, consider recreating the draft extension based on the current active version. This ensures that the draft is in sync with the active extension.
Activate the Draft: If the draft is correct and you want to make it active, ensure that you properly activate it. This may involve using the appropriate transaction codes or tools in the SAP environment.
Clear Cache: Sometimes, clearing the cache can help resolve inconsistencies. This can be done through the SAP system settings or by using specific transaction codes.
Consult Documentation: Refer to the official SAP documentation for guidance on managing extensions and drafts. This can provide insights into best practices and troubleshooting steps.
Contact SAP Support: If the issue persists after trying the above steps, consider reaching out to SAP support for further assistance. They can provide more specific guidance based on your system configuration.
By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK209 error and ensure that your extensions are properly aligned.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK208
OData Model &1 could not be read (likely syntax error)
What causes this issue? Reading necessary data of OData Model <(>&<)>1 for a Registry Check failed via API /iwbep/cl_mgw_metadata_fac...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK207
Getting OData Exposures for CDS View &1 failed (likely syntax error)
What causes this issue? Getting OData Exposures for CDS View <(>&<)>1 for a Registry Check failed. Most likely this is due to a synta...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK210
Former draft 1.0 condition field alias &1 was not found in CDS View &2
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
CFD_REGISTRY_CHECK211
Target &1 of former draft 1.0 condition field alias &2 is not a CDS View
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.