How To Fix CACSSESTD023 - Remuneration &1 has unexpected status &2 for settlement scheduling

CACSSESTD023 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CACSSESTD - Settlement Scheduling - Transaction Data

• Message number: 023

• Message text: Remuneration &1 has unexpected status &2 for settlement scheduling

What causes this issue?

The remuneration line has an unexpected status for settlement
scheduling.

System Response

The status that is to be set for the settlement schedule item that
belongs to the remuneration is in this case not clear. The settlement
scheduling is, therefore, terminated.

How to fix this error?

Check the status and reset it.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

INCLUDE ISIS_CS_WEITERE_DOKU OBJECT DOKU ID TX

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CACSSESTD023 - Remuneration &1 has unexpected status &2 for settlement scheduling ?

  The SAP error message CACSSESTD023 indicates that there is an issue with the status of a remuneration item during the settlement scheduling process. This error typically arises in the context of SAP's Commission and Incentive Management (CIM) module, which is part of the SAP Customer Activity Repository (CAR) or SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) modules.
  
  Cause:
  The error message CACSSESTD023 is triggered when the system encounters a remuneration item that has an unexpected status during the settlement scheduling process. This can occur due to several reasons, including:
  
  Incorrect Status: The remuneration item may be in a status that does not allow for settlement scheduling (e.g., it may be marked as "processed" or "canceled").
  Data Inconsistencies: There may be inconsistencies in the data related to the remuneration item, such as missing or incorrect entries in the database.
  
  Configuration Issues: The configuration settings for the remuneration types or settlement processes may not be set up correctly, leading