How To Fix BT231 - Failed to read scheduler table (BTCOMSDL).

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: BT - Background processing messages

• Message number: 231

• Message text: Failed to read scheduler table (BTCOMSDL).

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message BT231 - Failed to read scheduler table (BTCOMSDL). ?

  The SAP error message BT231, which indicates "Failed to read scheduler table (BTCOMSDL)," typically arises in the context of background processing in SAP systems. This error can occur due to various reasons, including issues with the database, configuration problems, or inconsistencies in the background job scheduling.
  Causes:
  
  Database Issues: The database table BTCOMSDL may be locked, corrupted, or not accessible due to database connectivity issues.
  Authorization Problems: The user executing the job may not have the necessary authorizations to read the scheduler table.
  Configuration Errors: Incorrect configuration settings in the background processing settings can lead to this error.
  System Performance: High load on the system or performance issues can prevent the scheduler from accessing the required table.
  Transport Issues: If the system has recently undergone a transport, there may be inconsistencies in the data.
  
  Solutions:
  
  Check Database Connectivity: Ensure that the database is up and running and that there are no connectivity issues. You can check the database logs for any errors.
  Table Locking: Use transaction code SM12 to check for any locks on the BTCOMSDL table. If there are locks, you may need to release them.
  Authorization Check: Verify that the user has the necessary authorizations to access the BTCOMSDL table. You can check this using transaction code SU53 after the error occurs.
  System Performance: Monitor system performance using transaction codes like ST22 (dump analysis) and SM50 (process overview) to identify any bottlenecks.
  Reconfigure Background Jobs: Review the configuration settings for background jobs in transaction SM37 and ensure that they are set up correctly.
  Check for Transport Issues: If the issue arose after a transport, check the transport logs and ensure that all objects were transported correctly.
  Database Table Consistency: You can run consistency checks on the database tables using transaction SE14 to ensure that the BTCOMSDL table is consistent.
  
  Related Information:
  
  
  Transaction Codes:
  
  SM12: To check and manage table locks.
  SU53: To analyze authorization issues.
  SM37: To monitor background jobs.
  ST22: To analyze short dumps.
  SM50: To monitor active processes.
  SE14: To check database table consistency.
  
  
  
  SAP Notes: Check the SAP Support Portal for any relevant SAP Notes that may address this specific error or provide additional troubleshooting steps.
  
  
  If the issue persists after trying the above solutions, it may be necessary to involve your SAP Basis team or SAP support for further investigation.