How To Fix AXT_MODEL125 - Manual field definition is invalid

AXT_MODEL125 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: AXT_MODEL -

• Message number: 125

• Message text: Manual field definition is invalid

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message AXT_MODEL125 - Manual field definition is invalid ?

  The SAP error message AXT_MODEL125, which states "Manual field definition is invalid," typically occurs in the context of data modeling or configuration within SAP systems, particularly when working with SAP BW (Business Warehouse) or SAP HANA.
  
  Cause:
  
  Invalid Field Definition: The error usually arises when a field that has been manually defined in a data model (like an InfoObject, DSO, or CompositeProvider) does not meet the required criteria or has been incorrectly configured.
  Data Type Mismatch: The field may have a data type that is incompatible with the expected data type in the model.
  Missing Attributes: Required attributes or properties for the field may be missing or incorrectly set.
  Inconsistent Naming: The field name may not adhere to naming conventions or may conflict with existing fields.
  Technical Settings: The technical settings for the field may not be properly defined, leading to inconsistencies.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Review Field Definition: Go to the data model where the error is occurring and review