How To Fix ACM_SYNTAX006 - Parser was not able to identify authorization relevance

ACM_SYNTAX006 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: ACM_SYNTAX - ACM: DCL Syntax Error Messages

• Message number: 006

• Message text: Parser was not able to identify authorization relevance

What causes this issue?

The DCL Document was parsed but failed while trying to identify
authorization relevant paths or fields.

System Response

The parser aborts with the error message

How to fix this error?

Check the syntax for fields and paths you want to define authorizations
for in your DCL Document. Pay attention on the parts after "WHERE" and
the comparison operator (ASPECT, ASPECT PFCG_AUTH) In case of questions
about the syntax take a look into the documentation of DCL.

Procedure for System Administrators

Inform the developer to correct the DCL Document.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message ACM_SYNTAX006 - Parser was not able to identify authorization relevance ?

  The SAP error message ACM_SYNTAX006 indicates that the parser was unable to determine the authorization relevance of a specific object or operation. This typically occurs in the context of the Authorization Check Mechanism (ACM) in SAP, which is responsible for ensuring that users have the necessary permissions to perform certain actions.
  
  Cause:
  
  Syntax Issues: The error may arise from incorrect syntax in the authorization object definitions or in the way the authorization checks are implemented in the ABAP code.
  Missing Authorization Objects: If the authorization object being referenced does not exist or is not properly defined, the parser may fail to identify its relevance.
  
  Configuration Issues: There may be issues in the configuration of the authorization checks, such as missing or incorrectly set parameters.
  Custom Code: If there is custom ABAP code that interacts with authorization checks, it may not be properly structured or may not follow the expected conventions.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Syntax: Review the syntax of