How To Fix ACM397 - A redefinition for entity '&1' already exists in rule &2 of DCL '&3'

ACM397 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: ACM - Message-Class for all ACM functions/exceptions

• Message number: 397

• Message text: A redefinition for entity '&1' already exists in rule &2 of DCL '&3'

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

ACM397 - Details

• The SAP error message ACM397 indicates that there is a conflict in the definition of an entity within a Data Control Language (DCL) rule. Specifically, it means that a redefinition for the specified entity already exists in the given rule of the DCL. This typically occurs in the context of authorization management, where entities (like roles, users, or permissions) are defined and managed.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Definitions: The error is often caused by having multiple definitions for the same entity within the same DCL rule. This can happen if the same entity is defined more than once, either directly or indirectly.
  Incorrect Rule Configuration: There may be a misconfiguration in the DCL rules where the same entity is being referenced multiple times in a way that is not allowed.
  Changes in Entity Definitions: If there have been recent changes to the definitions of entities or rules, it may lead to conflicts if the changes are