Message type: E = Error
Message class: 9J -
Message number: 771
Message text: Table &1 updated from condition table &2 to &3 by user &4
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
9J771
- Table &1 updated from condition table &2 to &3 by user &4 ?The SAP error message 9J771 indicates that a table (denoted as &1) has been updated from one condition table (denoted as &2) to another condition table (denoted as &3) by a specific user (denoted as &4). This message typically arises in the context of condition records in pricing or other areas where condition tables are used.
Cause: The error message usually occurs due to one of the following reasons: Data Inconsistency: There may be inconsistencies in the condition records or the way they are being updated. Authorization Issues: The user attempting to perform the update may not have the necessary authorizations to make changes to the specified condition tables. System Configuration: There may be issues with the configuration of the condition tables or the way they are linked to the pricing procedure. Concurrent Updates: Another user may be updating the same condition records simultaneously, leading to conflicts.
Solution: To resolve the error, you can take the following steps: Check
Get instant SAP help. Sign up for our Free Essentials Plan.
9J770
XPRA executed successfully, entry in table T681V has been deleted for J
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
9J769
There is inconsistent data in table &1, client &2 - see long text
What causes this issue? There is inconsistent data in the given table for the given client.System Response Please check this data and clean it up. T...
9J772
Condition table & is generated
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
9J773
Number of entries with usage type 'J' = &1
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.