How To Fix 6D776 - &1 (&2): Status of all subobjects set to "&3"

6D776 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: 6D - Real Estate Messages

• Message number: 776

• Message text: &1 (&2): Status of all subobjects set to "&3"

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message 6D776 - &1 (&2): Status of all subobjects set to "&3" ?

  The SAP error message 6D776 typically indicates an issue related to the status of subobjects in a particular context, such as a project or a document. The message format you provided includes placeholders for specific details, which can vary based on the situation. Here's a breakdown of the components:
  
  &1: This usually represents the object type or identifier.
  &2: This could be the specific object or instance that is being referenced.
  &3: This indicates the status that has been set for all subobjects.
  
  Cause
  The error message generally arises when there is an inconsistency or an unexpected status change in the subobjects associated with a main object. This could be due to:
  
  Manual Changes: A user may have manually changed the status of the main object, which in turn affects all associated subobjects.
  System Processes: A background job or a batch process may have updated the status of the main object, leading to a cascading effect on