How To Fix FF822 - Steuerkennzeichen &1 falsch definiert -> Rundung Reverse Charge &2 > &3


SAP Error Message - Details

  • Message type: E = Error

  • Message class: FF - FI Function Module Messages

  • Message number: 822

  • Message text: Steuerkennzeichen &1 falsch definiert -> Rundung Reverse Charge &2 > &3

  • Show details Hide details
  • Was verursacht dieses Problem?

    Tax code &V1& is defined as a reverse charge tax code.
    The result of the calculation is a tax amount of &V2&, rather than a
    balance of zero. This tax amount exceeds the permitted maximum variance
    of &V3&.

    Systemantwort

    The system assumes that tax code &V1& is not correctly defined.
    It is not possible to post using this tax code.

    Wie behebe ich diesen Fehler?

    Please correct the definition of tax code &V1&. The tax basis amount
    (tax information) always contains the same +/- sign as the percentage
    for the relevant tax condition. Regarding reverse charge tax codes, see
    the field help documentation for the field "EU Code / Code" in
    transaction FTXP, "Maintain Tax Codes: Tax Rates", under "Properties",
    if you have entered for the output tax a different +/- sign for the
    percentage in transaction FTXP, for example.
    Examples with the fictional tax base (amount) 1000 (note that this list
    - using 10% here - is not complete; there are many other possible
    definitions):
    1) Both conditions contain the same tax base, and the percentages are
    identical. This is incorrect and needs to be corrected.
    Definition (price determination schema, that is, 100, 110, and 120 are
    the rows in the price determination schema)
    100 Tax Base
    110 Account key MWS or preferably ESA of 100 10%
    120 Account key VST or preferably ESE of 100 10%
    Resulting Tax Information (BSET)
    Tax base 1000 for row 110 and 1000 for row 120.
    Tax 100 for row 110 and 100 for row 120.

    Das System gibt eine Fehlermeldung aus und erlaubt Ihnen nicht, mit dieser Transaktion fortzufahren, bis der Fehler behoben ist.

    2) Both conditions contain the same tax basis in terms of their amounts
    and relate to the same condition; this is the best solution:
    100 Tax Base
    110 Account key VST or preferably ESE of 100 10%
    120 Account key MWS or preferably ESA of 100 -10%
    Resulting Tax Information (BSET)
    Tax base 1000 for row 110 and -1000 for row 120.
    Tax 100 for row 110 and -100 for row 120.
    3) One condition contains -100%, the other condition contains 10%; this
    is not what we would actually recommend, but it is not wrong. The second
    tax condition consequently uses the tax amount from the first tax
    condition as its base; this is correct, as confusing as it may sound:
    100 Tax Base
    110 Account key VST or preferably ESE of 100 10%
    120 Account key MWS or preferably ESA of 110 -100%
    Resulting Tax Information (BSET)
    Tax base 1000 for row 110 and -100 for row 120.
    Tax 100 for row 110 and -100 for row 120.
    4) Both conditions contain, in terms of their amounts, different tax
    bases, the percentages are not identical, but the tax amounts (as well
    as their +/- signs) are the same; this is incorrect and needs to be
    changed.
    100 Tax Base
    110 Account key MWS or preferably ESA of 100 -10%
    120 Account key VST or preferably ESE of 110 100%
    Resulting Tax Information (BSET)
    Tax base -1000 for row 110 and 100 for row 120.
    Tax -100 for row 110 and -100 for row 120.
    5) Both conditions contain a negative tax base. The percentages are not
    identical, but the tax amounts are the same, albeit with different +/-
    signs. This is not wrong but nevertheless misleading and ought to be
    changed if possible.
    100 Tax Base
    110 Account key MWS or preferably ESA of 100 -10%
    120 Account key VST or preferably ESE of 110 -100%
    Resulting Tax Information (BSET)
    Tax base -1000 for row 110 and -100 for row 120.
    Tax -100 for row 110 and 100 for row 120.
    6) The condition is defined positive for the output tax and negative for
    the input tax, so that the output tax is posted with the same
    debit/credit indicator as the associated tax-relevant line and the input
    tax with a different debit/credit indicator. This is incorrect and must
    be changed (see 2, for example) because the input tax should be posted
    with the same debit/credit indicator as the associated tax-relevant
    line.
    100 Tax Base
    110 Account key VST or preferably ESE of 100 -10%
    120 Account key VAT or preferably ESA of 100 10%
    Resulting Tax Information (BSET)
    Tax base -1000 for row 110 and 1000 for row 120.
    Tax -100 for row 110 and 100 for row 120.

    Vorgehensweise für Systemadministratoren


    Fehlermeldungsextrakt aus SAP-System. Copyright SAP SE


Smart SAP Assistant

  • Was ist die Ursache und Lösung für den SAP Fehler FF822 - Steuerkennzeichen &1 falsch definiert -> Rundung Reverse Charge &2 > &3 ?




    • Do you have any question about this error?


      Upgrade now to chat with this error.


Instant HelpGet instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.


Zugehörige SAP-Fehlermeldungen

Klicken Sie auf die Links unten, um die folgenden verwandten Nachrichten anzuzeigen:

Klicken Sie auf diesen Link, um alle SAP-Meldungen durchsuchen.


Rating
ERPlingo's SAP support assistant is amazing. Saves me countless hours trying to solve complex SAP issues myself. It's a real game changer!
Rate 1
Thomas Michael
SAP Consultant, Author & Speaker