How To Fix S#351 - User comparison completed for composite role &

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: S# -

• Message number: 351

• Message text: User comparison completed for composite role &

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message S#351 - User comparison completed for composite role & ?

  The SAP error message S#351 indicates that a user comparison has been completed for a composite role, but it may also imply that there are issues or discrepancies that need to be addressed. Here’s a breakdown of the cause, potential solutions, and related information:
  Cause:
  
  User Comparison Process: The user comparison process is part of the role management in SAP, where the system checks the users assigned to a role against the actual users in the system. This is particularly relevant for composite roles, which are roles that contain other roles.
  Discrepancies: The message may indicate that there are discrepancies between the users assigned to the composite role and the actual users who should have access based on the underlying single roles.
  Authorization Issues: There may be authorization issues or missing authorizations that prevent users from accessing certain transactions or data.
  
  Solution:
  
  Check User Assignments: Review the user assignments for the composite role and the underlying single roles. Ensure that users are correctly assigned to the roles as intended.
  Run User Comparison: Execute the user comparison process again to ensure that the user assignments are up to date. This can be done in transaction code PFCG:
  
  Go to the composite role in PFCG.
  Navigate to the "User" tab.
  Click on "User Comparison" to run the comparison.
  
  
  Analyze Results: After running the user comparison, check the results for any discrepancies. The system will provide information on users who are missing or have incorrect assignments.
  Adjust Authorizations: If there are authorization issues, review the authorization profiles and adjust them as necessary to ensure that users have the required access.
  Transport Changes: If changes were made to roles or authorizations, ensure that these changes are transported to the relevant systems (e.g., from development to production).
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: Familiarize yourself with relevant transaction codes such as PFCG (Role Maintenance), SU01 (User Maintenance), and SUIM (User Information System) for managing roles and users.
  Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or help guides for detailed instructions on managing roles and user comparisons.
  SAP Notes: Check for any relevant SAP Notes that may address specific issues related to user comparisons or composite roles.
  Security Audit Logs: Review security audit logs for any unauthorized access attempts or issues related to user roles.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the issues related to the S#351 error message and ensure that user assignments for composite roles are correctly managed.