How To Fix RSFBP016 - Field with the name &1 already exists

RSFBP016 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: RSFBP - Open ODS Layer Object

• Message number: 016

• Message text: Field with the name &1 already exists

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message RSFBP016 - Field with the name &1 already exists ?

  The SAP error message RSFBP016, which states "Field with the name &1 already exists," typically occurs in the context of SAP BW (Business Warehouse) or SAP BI (Business Intelligence) when you are trying to create or modify a field in a data model, InfoObject, or similar structure, and a field with the same name already exists.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Field Name: The most common cause of this error is that you are attempting to create a new field or InfoObject with a name that is already in use within the same context (e.g., within the same InfoObject or data model).
  Namespace Conflicts: If you are working in a system where multiple developers are creating fields, there may be a conflict in naming conventions or namespaces.
  Transport Issues: If you are transporting objects between systems (e.g., from development to production), there may be a conflict if the same field name exists in both systems.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Existing Fields: