How To Fix BUCC102 - Library &1/Rule &2: The check type &3 of the new check rule must be &4

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: BUCC - Message class for Consistency checks

• Message number: 102

• Message text: Library &1/Rule &2: The check type &3 of the new check rule must be &4

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message BUCC102 - Library &1/Rule &2: The check type &3 of the new check rule must be &4 ?

  The SAP error message BUCC102 typically relates to issues with check rules in the context of the Business Configuration (BC) or Business Rules Framework (BRF+). This error indicates that there is a mismatch in the expected check type for a specific check rule.
  
  Cause:
  The error message "Library &1/Rule &2: The check type &3 of the new check rule must be &4" suggests that:
  
  You are trying to create or modify a check rule in a library (denoted by &1) and a specific rule (denoted by &2).
  The check type you are attempting to use (denoted by &3) does not match the expected check type (denoted by &4) for that rule.
  This could happen if the rule was designed to work with a specific type of check, and you are trying to apply a different type that is not compatible.
  
  
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you can take the following steps:
  
  
  Check the Rule Definition: Review the definition